Correctness of the Decision of the Allahabad High Courtīabri Masjid was constructed by Emperor Babur, through his commander Mir Baqi.ĭisputes broke out between Hindus & Muslims in the vicinity of the structure.Was the doctrine of ‘lost grant’ applicable to the present case?.Had the Sunni Board perfected their title to the disputed property by adverse possession?.

Was the principle of ‘waqf by user’ attracted to the present case?.

Does the change of sovereign of a land affect the adjudication of disputes of title to the land?.

4 (Instituted by Sunni Central Waqf Board)

How was the evidence that was led for proving the nature and use of the disputed structure, interpreted?.

How was the report of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) appreciated?.

Who had the shebaiti rights to the deity and does the shebait have the exclusive right to sue on behalf of the deity?.

Whether Bhagwan Shri Ram Virajman & Shri Ram Janma Bhoomi are juristic persons?.

5 (Instituted by Bhagwan Shri Ram Virajman through a next friend)

Had Nirmohi Akhara proven their uninterrupted possession of the inner courtyard of the disputed property?.

Is a civil suit filed for recovering a right from an authority discharging a statutory function valid?.

Had the suit abated after the death of Gopal Singh Visharad?.

Was the law of res judicata attracted to the present proceedings?.Suit of 1885 (Instituted by Mahant Raghubar Das).Composition of the Bench & Members of the Bar involved

Asi report on ayodhya pdf